Saltar al contenido
Fewer Monday-morning breaches

Someone will test your software. Choose who.

If you only run happy-path QA, the real world will run the opposite: stolen sessions, leaked APIs, dependencies with known holes, containers left wide open. We simulate that chaos on purpose—then hand you a ranked fix list your developers can actually execute.

Illustration: security review of a web application before attackers find vulnerabilities.

What this actually is—in plain language

Think of it as a deep health check performed by people who enjoy breaking things politely. We look at your running site/API like a stranger on the internet, read your source for dangerous patterns, scan the ingredients list of your dependencies, inspect how your containers are built, verify encryption, and double-check the knobs that provision your cloud. You get screenshots, logs, and a spreadsheet of what to fix first.

What stays exposed if you skip this

  • Silent data leaks: APIs that return too much, logs that store secrets, admin panels indexed by Google.
  • One CVE away from ransomware: outdated packages someone googles in five minutes.
  • Reputation hits: customers reading about your breach instead of your roadmap.
  • Fire-drills at midnight: incidents cost 10× more than fixing the root cause calmly.
Abstract illustration of security risk: alerts, exposed credentials, and threat pressure on systems.

What you walk away with

check_circle

A prioritized backlog: critical first, noisy false positives filtered out.

check_circle

Developers know *where* to change code—not just “something failed”.

check_circle

Leaders get a one-page risk story for budgets and timelines.

check_circle

Re-test path: we can rerun the cycle after fixes so confidence compounds.

Two ways to buy peace of mind

Same hard-nosed methodology—pick the shape that matches how you ship. Pricing and calendars only via contact.

edit_note

Per project

Perfect before a launch, an acquisition review, or a “we inherited this codebase” moment. Workshop to lock scope, intense cycle, remediation matrix you can paste into Jira.

Request via contactarrow_forward
calendar_month

Annual package

For teams that ship monthly. Bundled cycles (e.g., quarterly or per major release), reserved windows, and continuity so security does not fall off the roadmap.

Request via contactarrow_forward

Six layers—we hunt where attackers stack advantages

You do not need to memorize the acronyms. You *do* need to know we cover the full stack from browser to Terraform.

radar

Hit it from the outside

Dynamic / DAST

Automated probes plus scripted flows that mimic stolen tokens, broken auth, and weird payloads—exactly what a botnet tries first.

code

Read the source for landmines

Static / SAST

Dangerous patterns, weak crypto usage, accidental credential leaks—found before a stranger runs the code.

inventory_2

Audit the ingredient list

Dependencies / SCA

Known CVEs in libraries you did not write but still ship to production.

layers

Inspect the shipping crate

Containers

How the image is built, which user it runs as, whether filesystems are writable when they should not be.

encrypted

Verify the front door lock

TLS & headers

Certificates, protocols, and browser headers that stop trivial downgrade attacks.

cloud_circle

Check the scaffolding

IaC / cloud config

Terraform/OpenTofu and policies that accidentally expose storage buckets or admin ports.

Clean dashboards and green indicators after remediation and a successful security cycle.

Artifacts your team can use Monday morning

  • Executive summary in Spanish or English—what burned, what can wait, what is false alarm.
  • Machine-readable outputs (SARIF/JSON/HTML) so you can plug findings into the tools you already pay for.
  • Owner + deadline columns so accountability is obvious.
  • Optional clean-cycle memo when we re-run and the noise is gone.

We still speak “standards” when you need it

Helpful when procurement asks “against what?”—not homework for your developers day-to-day.

  • check_circleOWASP ASVS & API Top 10 for structured coverage.
  • check_circleNIST testing families when you need enterprise vocabulary.
  • check_circleCVSS scoring so every bug has the same severity ruler.

Where we shine

1

Customer-facing web apps and mobile backends with real auth.

2

Public APIs monetized or not—if it has a URL, we can reason about it.

3

Integration hubs (payments, identity, government connectors) where one bug becomes headline news.

Team reviewing a findings matrix and handing off remediation work after the audit.

Shipping a PUI connector?

Stack the same security bar on the middleware we build—one conversation, two delivery streams.

PUI middlewarearrow_forward

Let us be the chaos before the internet is

Tell us what you ship, who uses it, and when the next release lands—we’ll propose a cycle plan that fits. Everything starts with a contact message.